Once
there was an island nation. Coconut island. On Coconut Island there
were 100 citizens, 100 acres of land, 100 coconut trees, and 100
wells worth of housing, clothing food and water. ( 1 citizen
requires about ½ a share of each to live at all. )
It
was a virgin and empty land. But then the 1st citizen
sprang from the very earth, and claimed 32 of all the acres, coconuts
and wells. The next few arrived and claimed some more, until the 10th
when 80 of all the acres, trees and wells were claimed. Them came the
next 70 citizens who shared 20 acres, trees and wells between them.
These last few found that they lacked the water and coconuts needed
to eat and be hydrated so they were pressed into service by the 10 at
the top, who paid them about 15 coconut trees worth of food and
about the same of water, so that they had just enough to keep on
working the land of the 10, and particularly the 1st who
again had about a third of the acres, trees and water to himself.
Now to compound all this 20 more citizens arrived and having NO share
of the land, trees, or water, sold themselves for 10 coconut trees
and wells worth of resources, which only ensured that the 70 above
them had even less coconuts, water and resources ( say their 20 in
wealth and now 15 in 'wages); while those 10 at the top could skim a
bit more since the bottom 20 had no leverage upon which to bargain,
lacking ANY land that was their own and needing to beg even this from
some portion of the 80% of citizens above them, such that if they do
not work on the terms presented they do not eat, are not housed, and
don't even have access to water.
So
to recap we have 100 acres of land; 100 coconut trees ; 100 wells;
and 100 citizens total that are distributed such that:
1
citizen has 32 acres, trees and wells
the
next 9 have 48 acres, trees and wells between them
Then
there are a further 70 that have about 20 to share, and who must
therefore labor for the other 15 to just survive ….
and finally, the
last 20 citizens that have NO 'rightful' shares in any trees, water
or resources at all, and who must labor for the entire 10 required
for bare subsistence. And who therefore put downward, pressure on the
wages of of the next 70 and their own ranks.
Therefore
the top 10% have about 80 minus 25 equals 55 or about 5.5 a piece
while the bottom 90% have 45 divided by 90 or on average about .5 of
a share ( with the poorest 20% or so being at minimum intake levels
and living exposed to the elements more often than not. )
Thus
the poorest have about 11 times less what the richest have even
though they are 9 times their number. And this is said by ALL, the
top 10, to be the way Heaven itself favors things, and at any rate it
is only the result of inevitable natural forces, so all is well –
for them.
That
is the material.
The mentality is that if the top 10 need or want a
thing, that is good, just, right and should be made to come about,
but if the bottom 90, and particularly the lowest bottom 20 want a
single thing that is 'entitlement' and in fact a sign of them having
life entirely too easy or that they have the wrong ideas! Those
lazy people that live outdoors, they get their .5 share needed to
live, thinking is not their lot! What else could they ever hope to
have? The nerve to ask for More! Why it defies My Best Interests!
Dirty bottom 90% of parasites! How do we bring more to drive their
wages down even more and to dilute their unity? Don't they know what
they owe us upper 10? Don't they know that we create wealth by
hording it among ourselves and paying them sustenance level wages?
To
which assertions of monetary sway the cowed and ignorant bottom 90
just sort of bleat: As you wish, and try even harder to live
on less and die off to make room for the greater greed … as they
have been told since birth that when they make less everybody has
more! And this is considered normal and good.
There
are those that will say such a place cannot exist and surely does not
exist; however, This Island exists. Oh but it does. It is called
America. The Good Ole USA.
We
have basically the same wealth and income distribution in the
imperial homeland as described above and the media and elite have the
same attitude toward the 'lower classes'.
If
the numbers were put on Coconut Island:
1
citizen would have ~35% of everything.
The
Next 9 would have ~38.5%
(
Top Ten = 73.5% of total wealth. )
Then
the next 50 have 26.5%
And
finally we have the NOW bottom 40 rather than 20 who have nothing at
all. So the top have gained, the next nine lost a bit, and we have
50 rather than 70 for the next class who gained a bit ( but still
just above the. 5 necessity level you will notice! ) and then a
doubly large under class of 40 citizens.
So
America is actually worse off than the Plutocratic Coconut Island I
sought to make, when the numbers are lined up side by side. Verily I
actually tried to make Coconut Island as 'not first world like' as
possible but America still had DOUBLE the poor and not very many less
'just making it' citizens. And if that is Okay to you, then you are
coconuts.
The Right Wing is always on and on
about the left, the liberals and the multicult; however you would be
hard pressed to find a single one of them that rejects the
Neo-liberal 'Free Market' rhetoric of the GOP or Torries. Why is it
that they reject one arm of the Oligarchy and cling so desperately to
the other? Lack of clear understanding as to the powers and forces
that shape our world is the answer.
The diagram at the left is how I
conceptualize the modern 'world order' at least in how it appears to
operate from the outside and from under its yoke. I make these
charts/diagrams and others to make it easier for myself to digest,
and more readily be able to analyze complex systems in motion, by
seeing the parts first, then understanding their interconnection and
then drawing what conclusions I may or can from that data. I find
that strengths and weaknesses of systems can be brought to the fore
in this way more easily than merely diving into disparate data as a
whole set and trying to make order. It is not a perfect method,
true, but it is what I have and therefore without further ado.
In the diagram to the above we have the
American ( imperial ) 'grand alliance' of the Feminists, Fags,
Minorities, Big-Money internationalists controlling both the nominal
right and left in domestic politics. The left uses this control
primarily to demand 'humanitarian' utopian missions, the right to demand access to the resources of just those places that
need more humanitarian missions, both agree that force is needed,
both do all of this based upon a usurious system that ensures the
Common ( non-female, non-colored, non-homosexual )Man at home is left
as both tax slave to and first victim of the alliance. They are the
source of human capital that keep the machine both maintained and
feed. In time since more is going out than coming in, they must be
expended and like Great Britain before us the 'Grand Alliance' folks
will leave us high and dry and seek greener pastures. This 'shift'
in power centers will be facilitated by the fact that World Imperium
is based upon cookie cutter identical oligarchies among its client
states. Such that it could be thought of like this relative to any
one nation:
Notice that Oligarchy forms a coil
about the nations, which coil is in effect a debt and credit based
economic, social and political prison. Oh a golden barred one to be
sure but never the less a prison it remains! Destroy the need for its
credit and you destroy its power at a stroke! The
Elite Rest upon their Credit Power.Repeat until you grasp this basic fact! The Elite rest upon
power over Credit and debt!
Now that we have touched upon some of
the basics. We shall deconstruct the above to attempt to have a
better look at its workings.
The modern Murri-Qwa is an
oligarchy. It is based upon the 1% Elite's ( domestically and world
wide ) credit dominance from which they control the PC radical left,
and the 'country club' end of the GOP. Hence we have an alliance of
the Feminists, Homosexuals, minorities, egalitarians and other
anti-Western forces with the Big Money Business over all things
interests, who have long been rootless cosmopolitans inside our
gates.
The power of this alliance is used
domestically to ensure dominance over the academia,economy,education,
energy, manufacturing, media, and politics. Their dominance is almost
complete.
In the diagram to the left, we more clearly can see that the Common
Man is the foundation upon which the PC-Big-Money alliance operates.
They are supported by and support fully the credit oligarchy both
domestically and internationally to a man. Both ( all major ) parties
are fully on board with the Imperial mission from their own end, and
use the Common Man as their servant and oxen in the achievement of
those ends with zero regard for the nation. Any complaints or serious
attempts to stop the gravy train are denounced by BOTH sides as
Racist, Xenophobic, extreme, outside the pale, not part of the
mainstream and nationalistic/fascist, and the rest of the world wide
interlocking series of oligarchies will do their best to ensure that
if the 'national' oligarchy cannot keep order that the 'world' will
punish the upstarts economically and invade them if need be to keep
them on the 'world' plantation.
It should be noted that to save
space I left out those groups that might form outside the triangle of
the elite to the left and above, those would be labeled communists,
anarchists, or socialists and be denounced, and to the right those
are populist, levelers, or 'Luddites' and are equally denounced.
What they have in common is a disgust for the operation of the 'free
market' and its steady impoverishment of real life people – the
Nationalist cares about his organic kind, the Populist about his
Country/Fellow-Citizens – and the fact that they will act against
the interests of the Oligarchy.
The oligarchy is glad to play them
off against each other, as and how it can. The oligarchy thrives on
ignorance to the point that it calls itself 'democracy'.
Now that we have some idea of HOW this
works out in real life domestically.
Let us look at the modern
American Empire. First it must be noted that the oligarchy that has
control of the American system is NOT new and was old when America
was young. In modern times it can be traced from the Italian Banking
Republics, to the Dutch Republic, the England under Cromwell until
about WWI, then it shifted to the USA which currently holds its
mantle and is the nominal imperial suzerain. What almost all of them
have in common is that they are:
1.) They are Usury Based – Debt and
bankruptcy are their lives blood.
2.) They are Free Marketers – they
demand access to others markets and resources.
3.)They are Militaristic – they will
go to war to get that access, or to collect debts as needed.
4.) They are oligarchies – everything
in the state tends to reinforce the power of the few over the many.
5.) They are plutocracies – wealth is
seen to be the measure of all in all, and comes in time to be the
SOLE virtue.
6.) They are Republics – since a
strong market requires a weak government to act as its doorman and
enforcer upon the commons.
7.)They are legalistic – the letter
of the law is used as a shield to protect the oligarchy and as a
weapon to punish the commons.
9.) They are Anti-nationalistic – as
they evolve they always either bring in more citizens or
servants/slaves that displace the citizens.
10.) They always implode into
Bankruptcy – and then the oligarchs head for new plantations and
begin a new leaving the wreckage as the responsibility of the nation
they just milked dry!
The diagram to the above right, shows
this pretty well. You have the oligarchy. They dominate all that
really matters, using the government to act upon the common little
people, who are left without recourse to justice from the rapacious
appetites of said oligarchy for profits based on usury and chaos.
The one to the left the effects of Usury upon nations: Bankruptcy,
subjugation and servitude for the nation, wealth, power and
domination for the oligarchy. Free your currency and prosperity
will follow!
And with that we shall talk a bit about
the power of currency and resource control.
Internationally the
empire main base of support is the simple and yet complex fact that
Dollars are needed to buy Oil and that oil is needed to have a modern
economy. This is the petro-dollar and it is the foundation
upon which the Imperial Power rests.
The reason the 'world' cares one wit
what the 'leaders of the free world' think is because they need their
banknotes to buy the petroleum needed to remain in the 21st
century.
If you think of the world community as
a fixed point and the Petro-Dollar
as a collar that can be used to
leverage the imperial domains about economically, politically and if
that fails to bring them sufficiently into line to weaken them for
the military blow, then you are not far from the mark. It is this
power and control over the volume and worth of the currency in
relation to labor and goods, that ensures their domination of the
Nations, from this flows the power to corrupt and buy elections so as
to 'legally' sell us into bondage to the Money Masters. This is so because their credit power gives them ALL the other power and authority which they posses!
To repeat and reiterate:
The
Elite Rest Upon Their
Credit Power! Thus
if this power is knocked out from under them, they rest upon NOTHING!
Remember
when going after a world wide Imperium go for the softs. And
the 'softs' of the world
system are
paradoxically the very credit and resource monopoly that gives
them their ability to project power. Rather
it is the false belief in its power and a false understanding of
money and wealth. * See appendix for related discussion. *
Hence
smash the credit monopoly and you smash the oligarchies 'grand
alliance'.
*
Appendix:
Money
and Wealth – their relationship to power and freedom.
In
the end the end 'money' and 'credit' are merely counters for Human
Labor. Once Any One of the Nations laboring under the Oligarchies
whip realize and apply this great truth the time of the Usurer of
over and never again will anyone consent to allow others to charge
them interest ( extra time and labor really ) for their own work.
Since if money is a counter for labor, then Labor is in fact the real
'money' and the actual wealth of a nation is measured not based upon
usurer credit and debts but upon its ability to labor and create
first its own needs and then secondarily to provide the needs of
others in exchange for the goods of those others. Thus the ends
comes when the greater mass is educated about the fact that THEY and
not some nebulous cabal create all the wealth of the nation. America
is the heart of the empire, it is also the ONLY land mass large
enough to survive a world wide embargo and successfully jettison the
economics of the Oligarchy and replace that with the assertion of
National Autarchy. Autarchy is very simply the status of being able
to provide for yourself. Such a nation would have NO use or need for
credit, free trade, or any of the other treacheries of the Oligarchy.
Such a nation that was large and had a nuclear deterrent could in fact
be the basis for a world wide reconquest from these usurious trash.
*
And for the above with Red Queen Ann ( Mircosoft Ann ) Lecturing along in my tortured prose! Lovely! :)
I had to read this twice to make sure I was not asleep. The balls on these people. That was a statement by an apparatchik in DC. Yes DC that den of Democracy, devout and doubled down on the Democracy ... * narrator gags on own sarcasm *
Um we here in the USA have a 'democracy' ( really it is a plutocratic oligarchy ) in which 1% of the people have 32% of the wealth, and give about 75% of all the political donations. 1.2 billion for the Congress both house and Senate Races. Those votes don't come from heaven. And people making 30 thousand and giving 10-50$ are not putting up that money.
2014 Campaign Contribution Limits On Nov. 6, 2002, the day after the 2002 midterm elections, a new set of federal campaign finance laws went into effect. Known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the law increased the contribution limits for individuals giving to federal candidates and political parties. Every two years, the Federal Election Commission updates certain contribution limits -- such as the the amount individuals may give to candidates and party committees -- that are indexed to inflation. Up until April 2, 2014, there were also aggregate limits on how much individuals could give to candidates, parties and PACs. On that date, the Supreme Court said the limit was unconstitutional in a case called McCutcheon v. FEC. The limit for the 2014 cycle was to be $123,200. Now, however, donors can give to as many candidates and committees as they want -- though they still need to abide by the per-candidate, per-PAC and per-party committee limits -- without bumping into an overall cap. Source: 2014 Campaign Contribution Limits | OpenSecrets Address : https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/limits.php
And again a 'democracy' usually does not ensure it richest members the ability to buy votes, offices and races ... that is a feature of Oligarchies.
Notice the Money Elite at the top in total control and the Demos or People as a cypher and really subjects not rulers of any kind. Thus NO Demos ( people ) Archy ( rule) But Oli ( few ) garchy based on Plutocratic principles or on amount of wealth. Thus wealth is the ruling power.
The good thing is that wealth comes and goes and Oligarchy is inherently unstable and as such no matter what tweaking or padding you put in place they will always either resolve to an more federated aristocracy tempered by what are in real life democratic/meritorious tendencies or a more centralized bueacratic tyranny styling itself as a monarch of some sort or another. Thus it is seems more desirable to simple skip this see-saw and either go to one or stick with the other. I would prefer the merit based system over the money based one. Just saying. I would rather leaders EARN their place than BUY their place and
that ethical merit count more than GDP or ROI. Seems more sensible all
things taken as a whole.
But until then, all that sane rational people can do is continue to try to present the case for new institutions, founded on a reality based understanding of society, gender and the rest. Organic Society based on Patriarchal Families or Nothing.
We must continually and without fatigue, reject the framing of the debate by both the faux right and left who are two arms of the PC Credit Oligarchy who is our real enemy.
The Parties are merely means to ends ... the Money Power that dominates them is the Cause for the PC Regime.
The Left will call us Fascists and the Right 'communists' -- the liberals will call us haters, and the 'conservatives' will call us Jacobin Crazies -- the centrist housewife rhinos and business 'conservatives' will combine both as they are a combination of the right and left mental defects that add up to the PC insanity surrounding normal rational people.
This however is NOT a weakness, as the system's 'support' is all artificial and exists solely in between the shapeless shifting world of media 'reality' and the unmeasurable reality of beliefs, ie it is very very fragile and only a good disappointment to the commons away from being rejected and replaced. And anything that makes it attack rather than stay on the defensive only exposes its 'new clothes' to more and more rational and sane persons. To be seen as the enemy of the deadly snake is not a bad thing, my dears.
If organizations allowed, nay funded by your enemy who dominates your reality, hate and denounce you as you call for the well being of your Kin and Kind to be paramount, then all is objectively very well indeed.
For if either of the enemies 'wings' have cover for you, or accept you, then you are either a lackey for the enemy or no threat to them at all.
But if they must fully press the attack all along their line that means you: 1.) have them terrified. 2.) are using up resources as they CANNOT relent once they commence, must like any Imperial dogma once it commits to your 'destruction' it must never relent as to retreat is to be reduced to irrelevance. 3.) Tying up time, and personnel that could have otherwise went to enforcing their insane edicts upon the remains of the Folk. And 4.) Providing a living example that standing up to their first few rounds of bluster and baloney is all that is needed to be able to weather their media tea cup storm, IF one has a strong base in his living Folk.
With that in mind:
Address the concept above, don't hide behind evasions about 'communism'. Deal with the reality of the statement don't bother with 'racism' or PC word play. Come with real solutions of STFU.
Read and address the text ... spelling games will not cut the grade.
