Thursday, April 6, 2023

Just How Far Do The ADL's Tentacles Reach?

 Just How Far Do The ADL's Tentacles Reach?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5hNZYifJavbU/

We all know that the the world's premier Anti-White

hate organization - the ADL - trains federal, state, and

local law enforcement across the United States.

At the federal level, we understand that the FBI acts as

the ADL's secret police - as the Cheka was for the

Bolsheviks.

But what's hard to comprehend is just how much reach

the insidious ADL has at the state and local levels.

Just how surrounded is the average American by the

influence of the ADL?

Let's examine the state of Florida as an example.

Attached is a list of the members of the ADL's "Florida

Hate Crime Coalition."

There are more than 340 government, law

enforcement, legal, and social organizations and

personnel officially partnered with the ADL in the state

of Florida alone.

Among these, we see at least:

~ 107 Government Bodies and Elected Officials

(including 40 mayors)

~ 23 Law Enforcement Agencies and Officials (including

17 police chiefs and sheriffs)

~ 6 State Attorneys

~ 58 Jewish organizations

~ 7 Latino/Hispanic organizations

~ 4 Black organizations

~ 4 Sikh organizations

~ 2 Hindu organizations

~ 2 Muslim organizations

~ 2 Asian organizations

~ 11 'Social Justice' organizations

~ 49 Gender Revolution / genital mutilation / sodomy

enthusiast organizations

There are others not counted in the above breakdown

that serve the interests of multiple groups and sociopolitical

agendas, such as the SPLC, South Florida

People of Color, and many more.

Every entity on this impossibly long list has proudly,

publicly partnered with the number one Anti-White

hate group in the world.

Scan the attached list/link.

It's absolutely surreal.

Everywhere you go... every government office you

pass... every cop you pass... law offices... civil rights

groups... family service centers... disability

organizations...

They all take marching orders from the Anti-White ADL.

And just how directly are those marching orders

received?

Thisa month, a FOIA request proved that Atlantis, FL

Police Chief Robert Mangold - who appears on the

attached list - takes directives straight from the director

of the Florida ADL, Yael Hershfield.

In released texts and emails, the ADL's Hershfield

appears to directly guide Chief Mangold and the

Atlantis Police Department's policing and public

messaging. The available communication is limited,

though, as Chief Mangold provides Hershfield with his

personal cell phone number - a strategy commonly

used by nefarious "public servants" who want to

conceal their actions from FOIA inquiries.

At this point, the question isn't "Who does the ADL

influence?" - it's "Who doesn't the ADL influence?"

Remember, this is the same organization that:

~ Monitors online transactions with full access to

PayPal

~ Monitors online gaming with full access through the

largest gaming companies and reports users to the

police for "hate speech"

~ Partners with and censors Google, YouTube,

Facebook, Twitter, and many more

And, of course, the ADL also:

~ Lists "It's Okay To Be White" as "hate speech"

~ Says that preserving Western Civilization is "racist"

~ Says that opposition to Antifa is "White Supremacy"

~ Promotes Anti-White Critical Race Theory in schools

~ Fights for mentally ill men's "right" to share the

bathroom with your daughter at school

~ Falsifies crime statistics to blood-libel White people

Every aspect of public life in the United States is

infected by the Anti-White "Anti-Defamation League."

When you begin to understand how much influence

such organizations truly have on our society, you begin

to understand why and how our society has turned to

shit; because they want it turned to shit and they have

the power to turn it to shit.

The ADL's reign of terror over the people of the United

States must be faced down and ended.

Their hate-fueled, Anti-White, Anti-American power is

an existential threat to the people of this nation...

...so you can bet your last devalued dollar that you

won't hear a word about it from any politician.

(ADL Florida Hate Crime Coalition:

https://florida.adl.org/hate-crimes/members-of-theflorida-

hate-crime-coalition/)

White people have been taught that White people are

evil, and everyone else is good.

Non-White people have been taught that White people

are evil, and everyone else is good.

That's not "divide and conquer."

That's "Kill Whitey."

What about the GOP/conservatives?

Video 1: A group of Black females attack a White female

at Target.

Video 2: A massive group of Black males attack and

attempt to murder a White male at the mall next door

to the Target where the attack in Video 1 took place

(victim is possibly Asian - conflicting reports).

Both videos are from this past weekend.

These videos are not cherrypicked.

These videos are not rare.

These videos are not random.

These are but two more videos in an endless and

ongoing list of videos that show the world exactly who

commits violence and exactly who suffers violence.

There's no "lack of context" for flying two-footed headstomps

on the skull of a defenseless kid in the fetal

position on a tile floor.

This is reality playing out in front of your eyes, and if

your mind wants to distort that into anything other

than what it is, that's because your psyche has been

head-stomped by Con Inc.

White people - White children - are under the constant

threat of Anti-White violence in America, and not one

politician will say a word in White people's defense.

The GOP has caucuses, community centers, campaigns,

and legislation explicitly for Blacks, Latinos, Asians, and

Jews.

And for White people - the number one victims of

violence and hate?

Silent disdain as we are institutionally disenfranchised

from the top-down and physically attacked from the

bottom-up.

Whistleblowers expose the FBI for framing innocent

White Americans for nonexistent "hate crimes" and

"domestic terror?"

GOP silence.

White elementary schoolers in Ohio are taken hostage

by Black students on their school playground, beaten

and terrorized, and forced to pledge allegiance to

"Black Lives Matter?"

GOP silence.

Whites officially become the number one victims of

violent crimes committed by both Blacks and Latinos

(not interracial violent crimes; total violent crimes) in

America?

GOP silence.

We've seen a concentrated effort by "Conservative

influencers" lately to downplay the nonstop stream of

Anti-White violence videos as some sort of fabricated

"eXtReMiSt pSyOp" meant to "DiViDe uS."

They can't counter the reality of infinity Anti-White

violence videos with videos proving "wHiTe PeOpLe dO

iT ToO!" - because there are no videos of "White people

doing it too." So instead, these phonies simply shout

the catchphrases that got us into this mess - "Muh

colorblindness! Muh MLK!" - and hope it's enough to

make their followers stop sharing - and stop believing -

reality.

Rest assured, if there were videos of "White people

doing it too," no one would have to go looking for them

as they'd be injected into the eyeballs of humanity at a

100% White People Bad vaccination rate.

The lesson here, of course, is that the people

committing Anti-White violence aren't the problem...

Showing the people committing Anti-White violence is

the problem.

When you're a protected class - meaning literally

everyone other than straight White people - that

means you're protected from criticism when you attack

the only legally unprotected, legally targeted class:

straight Whites.

Ironically, the only group you won’t hear Republicans

call natural conservatives is Whites.

Show us ONE instance of ONE politician mentioning

White people as a group in the affirmative. Then we

MIGHT give that guy a chance. Just one.

Case A:

~ Be 16-year-old Somali

~ Live in Minnesota

~ Repeatedly rape a 4-year-old-girl and an 8-year-old

girl

~~ ENTER 'AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM' ~~

~ Receive plea deal requiring no prison time

~ Be sentenced to no more than 116 days in jail

~ Face no requirement to register as a sex offender

~ Have all charges dismissed and expunged from

criminal record

Case B:

~ Be 14-year-old White American

~ Live in Louisiana

~ Post a video using the most popular word in the

English language

~~ ENTER 'AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM' ~~

~ Face charges for "Inciting A Riot," "Cyberbullying,"

and "Hate Crimes"

In October 2022, a White American was murdered by

an illegal alien when that illegal alien, unprovoked, split

the White man's skull in half with an axe.

It was caught on home surveillance, and the sight and

sound are utterly sickening (the video will be added as

a comment below this post, behind a content warning).

Yet virtually no one has heard about it.

Because there was no national media coverage of the

shocking murder. Literally none.

On October 17th, 22-year-old Jimi Patterson was at a

friend's apartment in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where 26-yearold

Israel Trejo - an illegal alien from Mexico - came to

purchase an axe that someone living at the apartment

was selling. Patterson and Trejo did not know each

other.

As Israel Trejo stood in the living room handling the axe,

Jimi Patterson sat casually on the couch. No words were

exchanged, and there was no conflict or commotion

before the moment Trejo hauled the axe back with both

hands and swung it straight down through the skull of

Patterson.

Lt. Brandon Watkins of the Tulsa Police Department had

this to say:

“There’s no lessons here. There’s nothing to this."

Go ahead and read that again:

“There’s no lessons here. There’s nothing to this."

Now - you guessed it - we are going to "imagine if the

races were reversed."

Because if they were, we'd have the Mexican George

Floyd and the incident would be used to justify the

continued open flow of non-White migration across the

southern border of the United States for the explicit

purpose of displacing the inherently evil White

population of this country.

If a calm, quiet, unassuming Mexican national, illegally

in the US, was sitting on a couch in Tulsa, OK, and a

White American man, absolutely out of nowhere,

plunged an axe through that Mexican's skull, killing him

- and it was all caught on video...

~ Would there be a national media blackout or would

the media's spotlight shine brighter than it has since

Saint George of Minneapolis overdosed in proximity to

a White guy?

~ Would there be total Uniparty silence, or would every

grandstanding whore on either side of the aisle rush to

press conferences, TV appearances, and social media

accounts to "condemn the unconscionable and

unprovoked execution of an innocent man who was just

trying to make a better life for himself and his family!"?

~ Would there be total inaction from the FBI and White

House or would their bosses at the ADL have

immediately dispatched them to cook up "hate crime"

charges and recite headline fodder about this

indisputable proof that "wHiTe SuPrEmAcY iS tHe

GrEaTeSt tHrEaT tO tHe HoMeLaNd!"?

~ Would the police reflexively conclude that "there's no

lesson here" or would the world never stop learning the

lesson that "White People Bad!"?

As is so often the case, the system silence from the

Anti-White Industrial Complex is proof positive of their

complicity.

Some White American kid gets his skull split like

firewood by a non-White illegal?

LOL, shhh.

A non-White illegal gets his skull split like firewood

called a name by some White America kid?

FEDERAL HATE CRIME CHARGES.

My objective here isn't to point out some doublestandard

- it's to point out the only standard:

The Anti-White standard.

Because just as frightening as the unrelenting stream of

Anti-White migration and violence is the continued

insistence of so many White Americans that "it's not

about race!"

Of course it's about race.

The entire reason you haven't heard about this is

because the victim is an innocent White kid and the

murderer is an illegal alien from Mexico.

And our Anti-White ruling class wants more illegal

aliens and more dead White people.

Justice in America isn't blind.

It is actively ANTI WHITE ...

And it ain't just the USA these days ... the UK Canada

AUS and NZ are vying for second place in this race ...

Humza Yousaf is a Pakistani Muslim who serves as

Scotland's Secretary for Health and Social Care.

Here he is in front of Scottish Parliament condemning

all of the White people in the government of...

SCOTLAND.

"Not a single Black member of the Scottish Parliament -

to our shame."

"Not a single female woman of color - to our shame."

"The most senior positions in Scotland are filled almost

exclusively by those who are White."

"The Lord President - WHITE! The Lord Justice Clerk -

WHITE! Every High Court Judge - WHITE! The Lord

Advocate - WHITE! The Solicitor General - WHITE! The

Chief Constable - WHITE! Every Deputy Chief Constable

- WHITE! Every Assistant Chief Constable - WHITE! The

Head of the Law Society - WHITE! The Head of the

Faculty of Advocates - WHITE! Every Prison Governor -

WHITE! The Chief Medical Officer - WHITE! The Chief

Nursing Officer - WHITE! The Chief Veterinary Officer -

WHITE! The Chief Social Work Advisor - WHITE!"

"Almost every trade union in this country headed by

people who are WHITE!"

"Every Director General is WHITE!"

"Every chair of every public body is WHITE!"

"That is not good enough."

Let that last line marinate for a moment.

This man - with more power and influence than 99.9%

of Scotland's 96% White population - measures

"goodness" entirely in terms of how non-White

something is.

Now imagine a world in which this Anti-White bag of

shit continues to hold office.

Imagine a world in which this Anti-White bag of shit,

while continuing to hold office, spearheads "Hate

Crime" legislation to hunt down and imprison Scots for

objecting to this Anti-White shitbag's policies of de-

Scottish-ization of Scotland.

Imagine a world in which no mainstream figure stands

up and says: "Listen closely, you Anti-White bag of shit,

the fffucking government of Scotland is White because

the fffucking nation of Scotland is White!"

Imagine a world in which what we see here continues

unabated across Western Civilization, and where

anyone with the integrity to stand up to such unbridled

Anti-White insanity is forsaken from participation in

"polite" society, while Anti-White shitbags like Humza

Yousaf are promoted, pedestalled, and empowered.

Now imagine no more - because this is the world that

we live in.

But wait there is more ... Pakis are NOW WHITE TOO ...

as if Whiteness is a club you join.

Jordan Peterson, in his tireless quest to out-Jordan-

Peterson himself, has today informed the world that

Pakistanis are White.

He does this directly beneath a video of a Pakistani

accurately describing himself as "non-White."

Peterson doesn't object to this Anti-White Pakistani

Muslim excoriating the White nation of Scotland's

government for being... full of White people.

Peterson doesn't object to this Anti-White Pakistani

Muslim becoming the leader of the Scottish National

Party.

He simply arrives, acts as a human quaalude to keep

White people sedated, and collects his check for having

done so.

Jordan Peterson's only objection is to White people

waking up and noticing what's actually happening to us.

+++

The White Supremacist Origins of Exercise, and 6 Other

Surprising Facts About the History of U.S. Physical

Fitness

A 1922 photo of N.Y.C. officer workers showing off their

weight-lifting skills. (Bettmann Archive)

A 1922 photo of N.Y.C. officer workers showing off their

weight-lifting skills. Bettmann Archive

BY OLIVIA B. WAXMAN

UPDATED: DECEMBER 28, 2022 11:56 AM EST |

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: DECEMBER 28, 2022 7:00 AM

EST

How did U.S. exercise trends go from reinforcing white

supremacy to celebrating Richard Simmons? That

evolution is explored in a new book by a historian of

exercise, Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, author of the book

Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America’s Exercise

Obsession, out Jan. 2023.

Nowadays, at the beginning of every New Year, many

Americans hit the gym to work off their holiday feasts.

This momentum usually starts to fade in mid-January,

according to a 2019 analysis of data on fitness tracking

apps by Bloomberg. But such new year’s resolutions are

pretty new—as is the concept of exercise as a way to

improve bodily health.

“It’s really not until the 1980s that you start to have a

consensus that everybody should be doing some form

of exercise,” says Mehlman Petrzela, a professor at the

New School in New York City. That’s partly the result of

the women’s movement of the 1960s and 1970s, which

fought for Title IX, allowing girls to play school sports.

That pushed back on notions that girls and women

aren’t capable of doing vigorous exercise because

they’re fragile.

Perfect for reading on the treadmill or stationary bike,

the below conversation with Mehlman Petrzela outlines

the earliest ideas on exercise, delves into the history of

various popular workouts, and the outsize influence of

Richard Simmons.

Your book Fit Nation starts out by talking about how fat

was something to aspire to and that was a sign of

wealth and healthiness. How did Americans go from a

mentality of “fat is good” to “skinny is better?”

One of the things I set out to do in this book is to look

at the change in how we think about our bodies and

what’s considered attractive. Until the 1920s or so, to

be what would be considered today fat or bigger, was

actually desirable and actually signified affluence—

which is like the polar opposite of today, when so much

of the obesity epidemic discourse is connected to socioeconomic

inequality and to be fat is often to be seen as

to be poor.

How did that happen? Well, in a moment when actually

there wasn’t a lot of access to caloric foods, to be fat

showed that you could afford these things that were

out of the reach of most people and also you could

afford to rest, like you weren’t out there doing manual

labor all day. As that caloric food became more

accessible, and as more people were doing sedentary

white-collar work and had access to cars and leisure,

somebody who could resist those caloric foods,

exercise, and have a thin body, was seen as more

desirable.

Read more: The history behind New Year’s resolutions

to exercise more

What’s the most surprising thing you learned in your

research?

It was super interesting reading the reflections of

fitness enthusiasts in the early 20th century. They said

we should get rid of corsets, corsets are an assault on

women’s form, and that women should be lifting

weights and gaining strength. At first, you feel like this

is so progressive.

Then you keep reading, and they’re saying white

women should start building up their strength because

we need more white babies. They’re writing during an

incredible amount of immigration, soon after enslaved

people have been emancipated. This is totally part of a

white supremacy project. So that was a real “holy crap”

moment as a historian, where deep archival research

really reveals the contradictions of this moment.

Your book talks about how, at one point, America’s

focus was on exercising so we could have a population

that was ready to go to war. What is health and fitness

culture training us to do? How has that expectation

evolved over time?

During the New Deal [of the 1930s], the Civilian

Conservation Corps would recruit out-of-work or

impoverished, scrawny men to go work in the forest

and on public works projects. One of the ways that they

marketed this was “it puts muscles on your bones.”

That really picked up during the Cold War. Right after

World War II, you start to have more concern about

Americans getting soft, this idea that the things that

made America great—like cars and TV sets—were

actually taking a toll on Americans’ bodies. Presidents

Eisenhower and Kennedy went on a mission to make

exercise look wholesome and patriotic and focus on

shifting the purpose of exercise to being a good citizen

and defending your country.

In the 1980s, there’s a huge boom in the fitness

industry, connected to this “work hard, play hard”

mentality. I was also really moved speaking to gay men

who had lived through HIV/AIDS and talked about how

they exercised to display that they had a healthy body

at a moment when there was so much homophobia.

Some gyms became like community centers, sharing

medical information, almost like mutual aid societies.

Another big turning point is 9/11. You see a boom in

the CrossFit mentality of almost like militarized fitness

and girding yourself and your body for a fight—not

necessarily, by the way, in the 1950s/1960s way of

fighting for the U.S. Army—but more like “you need to

know how to perform functional fitness to protect

yourself if things go wrong.” At the same time, you see

[an emphasis on] wellness, self care and healing and

being meditative in an increasingly traumatic and

unpredictable world.

Read more: The big business of being a Peloton

instructor

What era of fitness are we in now?

Gym usage is rebounding rapidly since the pandemic

[lockdown ordinances], but now it’s also really efficient

for a lot of people to exercise at home. What’s so

unfortunate about the pandemic is how much it

accelerated fitness inequality. You can go home and be

on your Peloton if you can afford it, if you have the

space for it, but not everyone can.

I was meeting with somebody who’s very active in the

New York City pickleball world, and you have all of

these adults who want to do this inclusive recreational

thing, and they’re competing with children who want to

go out and skateboard and do basketball. Those are

wonderful things, and we don’t have the public space

to accommodate them.

Did you find an exercise that people don’t do now, but

they did do in a certain period of history, that’s just

comical to think about?

“Reducing machines” are a really good example of an

exercise machine that just went away. Well into the

1960s, women were not encouraged to do any kind of

strenuous exercise, but they were of course encouraged

to do whatever it took to be beautiful and slim.

So you would either lie down like on a bed or stand

with a belt around you, and the machines would shake

your fat. They were meant to enhance circulation but

also to shake away cellulite. Reducing machines were

everywhere; people would buy them for their houses.

There was one called the “magic couch” that every

woman wanted for Christmas.

The idea that all bodies can exert themselves and work

hard—including women’s bodies— is a really positive

development, and it’s one of the reasons that you don’t

see those passive exercise machines anymore.

In Philadelphia, a woman works out on a machine

designed to roll away fat while boxing champion

"Philadelphia" Jack O'Brien looks on. (George

Rinhart/Corbis—Getty Images)

In Philadelphia, a woman works out on a machine

designed to roll away fat while boxing champion

"Philadelphia" Jack O'Brien looks on. George

Rinhart/Corbis—Getty Images

How did running become a popular exercise in the

1970s? It’s often hailed as a great equalizer, an exercise

everyone can do with hardly any gear required? Did you

find that to be the case?

It became popular among environmentalists, people

who were imagining what it would be like to be in a

culture that was not centered around cars. The

sneakers back then were pretty rudimentary—old work

shoes with rubber soles.

But it’s important to point out that access was never

totally equal, if you lived in a neighborhood that didn’t

have safe streets or streets that were not well lit.

Women were catcalled. People of color were thought to

be committing a crime.

The “running is for everybody” discourse still quite

often leaves out the fact that depending on where you

live and the body that you live in, it can be a very

different kind of experience.

Read more: 3 things you didn’t know about running

Your book has so many interesting stories about the

origins of various workouts. I learned that Pilates can

be traced all the way back to World War I, when its

founder, Joseph Pilates was detained on the Isle of Man

and created resistance contraptions out of hospital

beds to help prisoners of war keep up their muscle

strength. How can the influence of Pilates be seen in

today’s fitness culture?

That sets the foundation for the idea that exercise isn’t

an indulgent little hobby some people have; it’s actually

something that can keep you healthy. Joseph Pilates

came to the United States, developing this system that

he first called “Contrology,” and he became really an

important part of the dance and performance

community. And that did a lot to raise the bar on what

fitness represented because, as I talk about at length, a

lot of the cultural associations with fitness were like

dank gymnasiums and big muscular men heaving

weights.

It sounds like Pilates made exercise seem like

something that could be graceful too.

Yes, Pilates’ studio on Eighth Avenue in Manhattan was

[patronized by] opera stars and ballet dancers who are

working on their bodily strength, so that did a lot to

sanitize and upgrade the reputation of fitness. A lot of

people embraced exercise as something that could

make them look like a dancer.

Read more: Here are the health benefits of Pilates

Fitness guru Richard Simmons sings alone with one the

the 60s classic tunes playing during one of his classes at

Slimmons Studio March 9, 2013, in Beverly Hills. (Brian

van der Brug/Los Angeles Times—Getty Images)

Fitness guru Richard Simmons sings alone with one the

the 60s classic tunes playing during one of his classes at

Slimmons Studio March 9, 2013, in Beverly Hills. Brian

van der Brug/Los Angeles Times—Getty Images

Going into this book, the only famous fitness instructor

I had heard of was Richard Simmons. How influential

was he?

He’s really important in terms of shifting who was

welcome in gyms. One of the reasons that he ended up

starting his own studio is that he went to this very

famous studio Gilda Marx, and he absolutely loved

aerobics, but he was asked not to come back because

women didn’t feel comfortable working out with a man

who was singing and so emotive during his workout.

And I think he opened a studio where everybody felt

welcomed there, including fat people, who felt like they

couldn’t step foot into a health club or a studio to take

an aerobics class because no one looked like them

there.

Today, you see quite a few fat people in the fitness

industry, who are operating from a better perspective,

which is that your body size does not necessarily

dictate your fitness level. We should not presume that

because you are fat, that you are not fit or that you

want to lose weight. And I think that we probably

couldn’t have had that without Richard Simmons.

What’s the future of fitness?

I would love for the future of fitness not only to be

about [WiFi] connected treadmills and luxury clubs

where people can go hang out and drink green juice

after their workout, but rather for a collective public

investment in making fitness and recreation available to

everybody and much more accessible than it currently

is. We do agree as a culture, for the most part, that

exercise is good for you, but our policy environment has

not caught up with that. We should acknowledge that

that’s one of the few things that we can agree on in our

culture, and then have a kind of bipartisan shared

investment in better physical education, better

recreation [spaces] for kids and adults.

+++

How textbooks taught white supremacy

A historian steps back to the 1700s and shares what's

changed and what needs to change

Photo by Mary E. Yacovone

BY Liz Mineo

Harvard Staff Writer

DATESeptember 4, 2020

SHARE

Email

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

Historian Donald Yacovone, an associate at the

Hutchins Center for African & African American

Research and a 2013 winner of the W.E.B. Du Bois

medal, was researching a book on the legacy of the

antislavery movement when he came across some old

history school textbooks that stopped him cold — and

led him to write a different book.

Yacovone, who co-authored “The African Americans:

Many Rivers to Cross” with Henry Louis Gates Jr. in

2013, is now writing “Teaching White Supremacy: The

Textbook Battle Over Race in American History.”

The Gazette interviewed Yacovone about the origins of

his research, his findings, and why he thinks it’s

necessary to teach the difficult story of slavery and

white supremacy and their legacies.

Q&A

Donald Yacovone

GAZETTE: How did you start examining history

textbooks from the 19th and 20th centuries?

YACOVONE: I had begun a different book about the

legacy of the antislavery movement and the rise of the

Civil Rights era. I had spent several months at the

Houghton Library before it closed down. When I was

nearly finished with one particularly large collection, I

wanted to take a break and find out how abolitionism

had been taught in school textbooks. I thought this was

going to be a quick enterprise: I’d go over to Gutman

Library at the Graduate School of Education, take a look

at a few textbooks, and keep going. Imagine my shock

when I was confronted by a collection of about 3,000

textbooks. I started reviewing them, and I came across

one 1832 book, “History of the United States” by Noah

Webster, the gentleman who’s responsible for our

dictionary. I was astonished by what I was reading so I

just kept reading some more.

In Webster’s book there was next to nothing about the

institution of slavery, despite the fact that it was a

central American institution. There were no African

Americans ever mentioned. When Webster wrote

about Africans, it was extremely derogatory, which was

shocking because those comments were in a textbook.

What I realized from his book, and from the subsequent

ones, was how they defined “American” as white and

only as white. Anything that was less than an Anglo

Saxon was not a true American. The further along I got

in this process, the more intensely this sentiment came

out, I realized that I was looking at, there’s no other

word for it, white supremacy. I came across one

textbook that declared on its first page, “This is the

White Man’s History.” At that point, you had to be a

dunce not to see what these books were teaching.

“Americans tend to see racism as a result of Southern

slavery, and this thinking has all kinds of problems.”

GAZETTE: What are the roots of white supremacy? How

is white supremacy connected to the history of slavery?

YACOVONE: White supremacy precedes the origins of

the United States. Every aspect of social interaction,

particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries, was

dominated by white identity, and white supremacy

became an expression of American identity.

Americans tend to see racism as a result of Southern

slavery, and this thinking has all kinds of problems. First

of all, slavery was in the North as well as in the South,

and the people who formed the idea of American

identity were not Southern slave owners, they were

Northerners. The father of white supremacy was not a

Southerner; it was John H. Van Evrie, a Canadian who

ended up settling in New York City. Van Evrie argued

that if no slaves existed, the class-based structure of

Europe would have been transferred, kept, and

developed in the American colonies. But with the

African presence, Van Evrie said, the descendants of

white Europeans saw that the difference among white

people was virtually insignificant compared to what

they perceived as differences between themselves and

African Americans. This allowed democracy, which was

an unpopular idea in the 17th and 18th century, to

flourish and develop.

We always forget that democracy was not an idealized

form of government back then. In fact, it was

considered an evil. Van Evrie’s argument was that

Americans had to reimagine a new kind of government

and social order and they could do so because of the

African presence. This can also explain why white

supremacy has persisted for so long, because it is an

identity of oneself in contrast to others, a sort of a selffulfilling,

reinforcing thought about one’s self-perceived

superiority. Even people who opposed slavery believed

that African Americans could never be absorbed by

white society. Samuel Sewall, who wrote the first

antislavery pamphlet in 1700, condemned slavery, but

he also characterized people of African descent as “a

kind of extravasate Blood,” always alien. His idea

remained central to the American mind for the next

200 years.

GAZETTE: Some historians say that white supremacy

ideology served to justify the enslavement of African

Americans.

YACOVONE: The main feature of white supremacy is the

assumption that people with Anglo Saxon backgrounds

are the primacy, the first order of humanity. Van Evrie,

however, saw people of African descent as essential to

do “the white man’s work,” and were designed to do so

“by nature and god.” He wrote about six different

books on the subject, and he used a racial hierarchy in

which Caucasians were at the top and Africans at the

bottom. You’d think that white supremacists were

driven mostly by hate, but at the core they were driven

by their ideas of racial superiority, which of course were

pure fiction and had nothing to do with reality. White

supremacy wasn’t developed to defend the institution

of slavery, but in reaction to it, and it preceded the

birth of the United States.

A lot of the white supremacists in the North didn’t even

want an African American presence there. Many

Northerners advocated the American Colonization

Society, which would export African Americans to

Liberia. But there was no unanimity of ideas about

white supremacy; the only thing they all agreed upon

was the “superiority of the white race.”

“White supremacy is a toxin. The older history

textbooks were like syringes that injected the toxin of

white supremacy into the mind of many generations of

Americans.”

GAZETTE: I once heard a Harvard historian say that the

Founding Fathers were white supremacists. Is that a fair

characterization?

YACOVONE: Of course. Thomas Jefferson is the classic

example. He is the individual responsible for giving us

the phrase that embodies the democratic promise —

“All men are created equal” — and set the trend to

exclude slavery from newly acquired territory. Yet, he

refused to free his own slaves, considered people of

African descent inherently inferior, and when he wrote

those famous words in the Declaration of

Independence he thought only of white men.

GAZETTE: What did the textbooks published in the 20th

century teach about slavery in comparison to those

written in the 19th century?

YACOVONE: For the most part, the textbooks from the

pre-Civil War period through the end of the century

followed a basic format: They would go from

exploration to colonization to revolution to creation of

the American republic, and then every succeeding

presidential administration. Anything outside of the

political narrative was not considered history and was

not taught.

During the brief period of Reconstruction (1863-1877),

the story emphasized the fulfillment of democracy, and

the ideology of freedom suffused many books. This was

a dramatic change. I even came across a couple of

books that contained pictures of African Americans,

and I was flabbergasted when I discovered one that had

a picture of Frederick Douglass — that was unheard of.

Prior to Reconstruction, textbooks had a few pictures,

some engravings. But they disappear pretty quick once

we get into the 20th century, because the “Lost Cause”

mythology takes over academia and white supremacy

reappears with full force.

“We’re not teaching students the true American history

because African American history is American history.”

During the 1920s, the 1930s, and the 1940s, it was

astonishing to see positive assessments of slavery in

American history textbooks, which taught that the

African American’s natural environment was the

institution of slavery, where they were cared for from

cradle to grave. There was a legacy of African American

writing about freedom, but the white power structure

simply wouldn’t accept it as legitimate. They dismissed

the slave narratives as propaganda, downplayed the

history of Africans before slavery, and ignored the work

of African American scholars such as W.E.B. Du Bois and

others.

GAZETTE: A report by the Southern Poverty Law Center

found that schools failed to teach the “hard history” of

African enslavement. What role have the textbooks

played in the miseducation of many generations of

Americans?

YACOVONE: This is the problem. We’re not teaching

students the true American history because African

American history is American history. I’ve been

lecturing about this project, and every time I ask

students what they learn about the history of slavery,

they all said, “Not much.” But even if there are

textbooks that deal with those issues in a more

accurate way, white teachers are so intimidated that

they won’t teach it.

GAZETTE: You mentioned in an article in the Chronicle

of Higher Education that while doing your research, you

found the history book you read when you were a fifth

grader. What did that book teach you about the history

of slavery?

YACOVONE: That was one of the great revelations of

this research. Like so many of these books, “Exploring

the New World” by O. Stuart Hamer and others, which

was published repeatedly between 1953 and 1965, said

almost nothing. All these books, particularly from 1840

for the next 25 years, go out of their way to not discuss

slavery. Some would say that slavery began in 1619, but

most said it began in 1620 because those who are

writing this narrative are New Englanders, and 1620 is

when the Pilgrims sailed on the Mayflower. Half the

books from this early period got the date wrong. If the

textbooks wrote about slavery, it was only one

sentence and would never discuss the nature of slavery

or include any descriptions. When American politics

became absorbed by the debate over slavery, they

could not avoid that, and would mention the 1820

Compromise [that admitted Maine to the union as a

free state and Missouri as a slave state] and the 1850

Compromise [that abolished the slave trade -but not

slavery- in Washington, D.C.]. None of the textbooks

published prior to the Civil War would ever talk about

the abolitionist movement, which began in the late

1820s. It wasn’t until 1853, when the educator Emma

Willard published her massive history of the United

States, that she mentioned the abolitionists, but she

didn’t say who they were or what they were about,

except that they were tools of Great Britain dedicated

to destroying the republic.

RELATED

A reading list on issues of race

Harvard faculty recommend the writers and subjects

that promote context and understanding

Tracey Benson

Helping teachers and principals confront their own

racism

New book raises awareness of unconscious bias, and its

effect on students of color

GAZETTE: What did the textbooks published after the

1960s teach about slavery? Has there been any

progress over the past few years?

YACOVONE: In the mid 1960s, textbooks began

noticeably to change because attitudes and scholarship

were changing in the wake of the Civil Rights

Movement. Scholars such as Kenneth Stampp

reimagined Reconstruction, and it had a dramatic

effect. There was a gradual reintroduction of the

African American element in history textbooks. And

now, many history teachers don’t even use textbooks.

They’re using online resources. Some of the best work

is being produced by the Zinn Education Project, the

Gilder-Lehrman Center, and the Southern Poverty Law

Center.

But even when textbooks are accurate, teachers have

to be willing to teach it. We know there are many white

teachers who are afraid of doing it. And you have to

have school systems, both public and private,

committed to doing this work and not to punish

teachers for doing so, which is happening. The

resources are endless. But it’s complicated because in

many states there are institutionalized approval

processes that determine what textbook will be used.

And as far as the publishing industry is concerned, this

is huge money. Texas and California dominate and they

determine what gets published and what doesn’t.

GAZETTE: What are the risks of not teaching the full

story of slavery and its legacy?

YACOVONE: This is essential work that has to be done.

If America is to be a nation that fulfills its democratic

promise, the history of slavery and white supremacy

have to be taught in schools across the country. We

need to acknowledge that white supremacy remains an

integral part of American society and we need to

understand how we got to where we are. The

consequences of not doing so are lethal. White

supremacy is a toxin. The older history textbooks were

like syringes that injected the toxin of white supremacy

into the mind of many generations of Americans. What

has to be done is teach the truth about slavery as a

central institution in America’s origins, as the cause of

the Civil War, and about its legacy that still lives on. The

consequences of not doing so, we’re seeing every day.

This interview has been condensed and edited for

length and clarity.

No comments:

Post a Comment