Friday, November 28, 2014

The Greatest Dangers to American Freedom


The Greatest Dangers to American Freedom are A Government that ignores the Constitution …  Thomas Jefferson

I have to differ and I shall use Thomas Jefferson's own words to justify my difference from this opinion of his. … it is for the peace and good of mankind that a solemn opportunity of doing this every nineteen or twenty years should be provided by the constitution, so that it may be handed on with periodical repairs from generation to generation to the end of time … We should be not worried about government and those that use it to their advantage 'ignoring' a piece of paper but must work as a Nation to ensure that WE John Q Non-hyphenated American as political beings can influence the Government more than the Money Changers that have bought our Nation's heart and soul! To the end of tossing said money parasites out into the Sea. So that we can have control over our lives again!

Now to the Greatest Dangers.

The greatest dangers have always been:

1.) That the Constitution allows for no means to go directly to John Q Public with the issues -- it would have never passed into law if it did!  ( Plebiscites work: Switzerland is hardly an Anarchy now is it?)

2.) That said public has no means of recalling officials, representatives or judicial figures or challenging a laws application, intent or validity.  ( again constitutional referendums work in most of the Western States, they are rarely used and almost always work out for John Little Dude rather than Wally Big Street. )

3.) It does not lay out what is taxable, what is income, or what for that matter under what terms 'gold and silver' equate to money in commerce -- and this is its fatal flaw allowing the 'nation' to be subject to the Credit Oligarchy. ( Basically unless a Nation controls the issuance of its own Credit and the value and volume of the same it cannot be strong. The Nation does somethings better than Wall Street. For more on that: http://newswithviewstoo.blogspot.com/2014/07/to-summarize-and-attempt-to-systemize.html)

4.) The very notions upon which the Constitution are based lack the concept of "DUTY" being tied to 'RIGHTS' and without that there can be no lasting order. When 'right' becomes a matter of not a performed minimal level of input but rather of just being alive ... you are bound in time to end up at A-Modern-ica and its failed PC status.  This again is a fatal flaw. 'Equality' is great and all but when the 60 IQed psychotic pre-primate is 'equal' to the 130 IQ Saintly Sage ... something is very very wrong and logic and ethics are being very sorely abused or forgotten. Those that do are equal to those that merely take, cannot work. All who make a certain level are treated the same -- that can work, under certain rules. But total equality is NOT possible because it is NOT part of natures reality.

5.) There is nothing in the Constitution that stops the government from doing 99% of what it does ... Mass Immigration is Treason from the Right's POV but it is NOT unconstitutional in the least ... Liberalism needs ditched ... 


 The Document will be set aside at some point:  "Let us provide in our constitution for its revision at stated periods. What these periods should be nature herself indicates. By the European tables of mortality, of the adults living at any one moment of time, a majority will be dead in about nineteen years. At the end of that period, then, a new majority is come into place; or, in other words, a new generation. Each generation is as independent as the one preceding, as that was of all which had gone before. It has then, like them, a right to choose for itself the form of government it believes most promotive of its own happiness; consequently, to accommodate to the circumstances in which it finds itself that received from its predecessors; and it is for the peace and good of mankind that a solemn opportunity of doing this every nineteen or twenty years should be provided by the constitution, so that it may be handed on with periodical repairs from generation to generation to the end of time, if anything human can so long endure." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1816. ME 15:42

And for more:

"Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent. But the power of repeal is not an equivalent. It might be, indeed, if every form of government were so perfectly contrived, that the will of the majority could always be obtained, fairly and without impediment. But this is true of no form. The people cannot assemble themselves; their representation is unequal and vicious. Various checks are opposed to every legislative proposition. Factions get possession of the public councils, bribery corrupts them, personal interests lead them astray from the general interests of their constituents; and other impediments arise, so as to prove to every practical man, that a law of limited duration is much more manageable than one which needs a repeal." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1789. ME 7:459, Papers 15:396

So simply meet under Color of Article V and have a Convention of Right/Center Loyal Americans from rural counties of a majority of states. ( have state delegations that vote as blocks for final vote as a de facto People's 'Congress' and there you go ... letter of law means NOTHING if the WILL to be a LAW is present!) It seems the 'lawful' way forward from this impasse and a way that most of Majority America could accept.  The internationalists, money bags and let us be frank minorities/special-victims-under-PC that would reject it: They shall not be consulted.

I suspect at some point Patriots will do just this to save what is left of the Nation IE their people. Under that Article Lays the power to write an entirely new organic document of any type desired.

The Descent into utter Madness

We all know the adage about 'those the gods would destroy they first make mad'. 

And true to form here we the western people find our self whirling about madly like a dervish in front of the electric marching orders deposit. The group mind has taken in so many kooky, crazy, and outright magical thoughts that it is impossible for us to know truth from false from within the system as it stands. We must abandon all attachment to it and set our selves free from its madness; stop acting foolishly expecting fools errands to end well; and become our natural selves yet once more.

To do this we must challenge the core concepts that underlay modern PC 'egalitarianism' as they exist in the Anglo-sphere nations and Particularly the UK and USA.

There are many key concepts like 'Tolerance' and 'Diversity'. But to my mind the primary one that seems to underlie a lot of the rest of the concepts and give them meaning is called 'White Guilt'. This underlies most of the rest of the plot to overthrow our nation. This concept creates the apathy among the masses and is the reason that so many of our own young are becoming cultural eunuchs that help with the task of killing off our ways and ultimately our kind.

White Guilt is PC's 'original sin' of sorts. ALL White People have this guilt for the acts of ALL other WHITE PEOPLE from all time to all time, even the poor since they have the 'advantage' of being poor Whites not dirt poor blacks! (IN fact if they complain of working to pay taxes so that they can live about equal to the Blacks who don't work by and large – that is a sure sign of 'racism' and hatred. )

The logic, as such, runs like this: Being born White means you are 'racists' and 'hate' coloreds because IF WHITE then racism and hatred! If Racism and Hatred then Diversity is needed. Diversity means non-White-non-male-non-traditional so If any White (males more than females as they are 'victims' in their own right) object to paying for PC, then more non-Whites (or even worse traitor liberal White Eunuchs) are needed to combat 'racism' IE ensure PC has its tax-base of White (traditional normal anti-PC) Males in check.

That is their Dogmatic Formula – The Anti-racists you will notice share the methodology of the Feminists and Homosexual degenerates who are also subversive to Western Society, while being simultaneously parasitic upon the masses of people that in fact make up Western Society. They are all in this way equal to Liberals -- they all use 'white' as an insult about equal to 'Nazi' or 'fascist'. Just like the other subversives. Just saying. (And the GOP does not talk about 'white' only us Normals do that. Accept it: We are doing our own lifting to get out of this. )

Whites are therefore told that if they just tolerate diversity – meaning the glorification of every other POV and activity but those of the WHITE MAJORITY – and therefore if they give up EVERYTHING special about themselves that they MIGHT just after enough groveling, tax give aways, 'social justice', social programs, single mother homes, raped women folk, and social degeneration to the level of the third world wash away this 'sin' committed by people that in most cases were not even their own ancestors by blood. And many of them at least play along if not actually believe this mamba! And all this on a 'might'! Madness!

It goes without saying that Whites Males that won't embrace gender equality, 'sexual equality', and every other moon-bat liberal pacifist eunuch creating culturally destructive idea unconditionally are the ultimate enemy of all Mankind – the Oppressor of Victims (who are everyone else but the non-Eunuch White. )

It is purely nonsense. Egalitarian Gibberish invented by Commie Subversives! It has about as much substance and reality behind it as Celestial Spheres or Squared Circles … IE it is a fools quest lacking empirical or moral foundation. To agree with PC is to agree to your own subjection to PC if you are a White Male, who rejects 'equality' and the rest of the feminine mantra put forward by the 'left' in modern Anglo-sphere nations.

To have it again: It has NO basis in truth, logic or ethics. The reality is that not one of us has any moral, ethic or logically demonstrable responsibility towards the Blacks or any other person outside OUR kind, and who is not loyal to OUR interests. Period.

The Reality is that not one of us has any responsibility for any slave, slave owner or the 'injustices' that created.

The Reality is that not one of the issues or problems among the Blacks is our issue, they have been given everything needed to succeed except those things which are INNATE and lacking to them!

The Reality is that Blacks and Minorities make their ghetto hoods and not racism or poverty or 'hatred'! The minorities do that themselves! The inhabitants make the dwelling! Not the other way around!

The reality is we are tired of accepting illogical pap like the above as normal good sound wholesome thinking!

The reality is that WHITE MEN are feed up with being told to tolerate being punks in our own lands, being told to tolerate being victimized by rapists thieves and murders. Being told this is their own fault when they clearly understand it is PC and its PETS doing this to them!

The Reality is that soon WHITE MALES are going to tell PC and its Pets to STFU and then History is going to change in a big f'ing way! Now I wonder if they can hear the Gods Laughing at them like Commodus?

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Sunday, November 16, 2014

A few Simple Questions for the 'Far Right Movement'?

Direct Questions for the Far Right Movement slash European Nationalists:

This should be simple. Basically for some background: I had shown a few persons the 'movement' in all its glory. They took in a bit of the views and opinions, on the forum boards this one among them. Looked around a bit. And had some questions.

Questions which will be asked by NORMAL working class European-Majority-People when you finally leave the nets and try to engage in Real World Politics.

You can take them personally if you must, but they are rewordings of actual questions asked about YOUR movement by normal people that did not want to post to your sites. Those people were heavy on 'right-winger-ness', and 'equality' was utterly absent from their thinking, if you will, so they were not automatically biased against European-Majority-nationalism.

Thus it would be rather cheap and lazy to dismiss them with childish retorts about not needing sheeple, and 'we will do what we want' and the like …

They are legitimate real world questions that any valid well thought out political program ought to be able to answer about itself, without angst and in a calm level headed manner. If you are to be 'European-Majority' Nationalism you might want to address some of the European-Majority-People in the Nations Questions. This will in theory bring the masses on side with you. Which is not bad because European-Majority-nationalism needs MORE and Better European-Majority-People!

And that is the stone cold truth.

Questions:

What is the end Goal of European-Majority Nationalism? What has it done to ensure these goals comes about? What are the means to be used to get to those goals? In very simple terms explain how reaching this goal will be of advantage to the Nation at large?

What other than 'European-Majorityness' are you offering? Better wages? Better conditions of employment? Lower taxes? Less debt? Better cheaper housing? Freedom from Usury? Debt Relief? A return to better morals? And end to Off Shoring and In Sourcing of jobs? Other?

Is there a unified message that can be encapsulated as a 'slogan' or 'program' of sorts? Who is the 'target demographic' of said slogan and what is being done to ensure they get and take to the 'message'? What steps if any is European-Majority-nationalism taking to ensure European-Majority-nationalism controls its message rather than being controlled by the media message about it?

What sort of government founded upon what basis? Created in what realistic manner? How does the movement intend to erect this government? And where?

Will there be a 'free market'? If so, what will the relation between the government and 'market' be if any? Who will control the issue of credit? What will be money? Under what terms?

What proposals does European-Majority-nationalism have for how and under what terms the nations credit will be provided? What will be its basis? Will the public or private or some mix of interests issue the money used in day to day life by the citizens of the European-Majority-nationalist nation? Will extra-national forces be allowed to influence this credit? Will the currency be a commodity as well? If there is to be a profit from the issuance of currency who shall take in said profits, private or public entities?

Will the plutocratic elite keep their wealth after European-Majority-Nationalism? Will the insider corporations keep their wealth and power after European-Majority-Nationalism? What will be done if anything to keep them from buying any European-Majority-Nationalist state like they have bought the Current Regime? Will they be allowed to flee to the four corners of the World and plot against us or will they be dealt with domestically?

To sum up all the questions: What will be so radically different from right now, or 50 years ago, that following European-Majority-nationalism’s lead is a worth while endeavor for the common European-Majority Man? What will the common European-Majority MAN actually GAIN by supporting European-Majority-Nationalism over say Populism or Radicalism, or frankly any political movement that is not internet based? Why should they side with European-Majority-Nationalism *?

Again Any decently thought out political-social-economic movement ought to be able to answer these sorts of questions in an orderly clear and concise manner. If a movement cannot even do this simple task: how shall it rule even so much as a village?

* And before the tools try the 'you should just give because' nonsense …. Even the NSDAP understood this simple fact: If you don't offer solutions, you are not helping your Folk.

ALL the actual real world Right Wing movements came with REAL WORLD solutions to REAL WORLD issues that really affected REAL working and lower middle class Folk! See the 26 points of the Falange, 25 points of the NSDAP, and the Italian Labor Charter for more all documents that I find Normal European-Majority-People respond very well to as long as they don't know the origin of said documents!